By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
selnor on 22 April 2012
Edit Thread
Andrespetmonkey said:
selnor said:
Ajescent said:

Personally I think GA is just and good as Uncharted 1 visually, same for Delta and Superstar DustHD, Lumines as...Lumines... basically. Current Vita games, to me look as good as EARLY PS3 games. For me that's a very respectable feat for a handheld. Sorry you fell for the hypetrain, which I find Ironic. Because when you do yours you 90/100 genuinely believe what you say (I seem to remember you saying something to that effect) but at the same time, the rest of the world doesn't always agree with you. 

You should have realised this when coming into Vita Hype Threads...the clue is in the name after all and as always Rule 1 of Hype threads  is you don't believe everything you read.


Graphics werent really what has stopped me getting one right now. It was that the game I was interested in was made into a swipe here, tap here affair. No big Uncharted moments, those moments you go wow in.

As far as the visuals, it was easy to see the flat textures on characters and scenery. Low poly models and jaggies. Jaggies were especially noticeable on shadows and Drakes clothing. The lighting is good, and this makes a big difference to how games look. But overall Golden Abyss was nowhere near Uncharted 1. Way to many things looked fugly when you look past the lighting. 

That's crazy. It has High-res textures, very similar character models and arguably better lighting (as you mentioned) and water effects. It looks at least on par with Drakes fortune in my opinion. 

WTF are some of you trying to do???????

I played it for a good hour and a half. When actually playing a PS Vita GA game, the textures look noting like Uncharted 1 on PS3. Nowhere near. Its rediculous to even lay that claim. In fact I think it insults Unchated 1. Those images there are way over ressed in comparison to the actual game. By over ressed I dont neccessarily mean the whole image I mean the textures themsleves.

Then theres te poly models. The very obvious polygons sticking out on objects, backpack straps, vines, water moving nowhere near the water in Uncharted 1 on Ps3.

Its all so absurd, its not even close to a discussion.

When playing it the first thing noteable is low res textures and low polys. Great lighting. But then thats comparing it to a PS3 game. Whic Im only doing because some really silly people think it competes. If I dont compare it to 360/ps3 then it looks great for a handheld.

If comparing then not even close.

The fact its being suggested after pysically seeing these differences is just beyond crazy.

 

Truth is Uncharted 1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UCGA>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3DS>>>>>>>>>>>>DS>>>N64