pezus said:
A while back somebody did a comparison and Edge rated 360 exclusives higher than PS3 ones on average (when taking the metacritic scores into account). Edit: Found it! - http://edgevsmeta.blogspot.com/ "The consistency of the score differences is remarkable. Whether comparing the top 10,20 or 30 games, the 360 is always scored higher by EDGE, followed by multiplatforms, and followed by PS3 exclusives in the last place. The lines are relatively straight and flat, with no lines crossing each other or switching places after the top 10. If EDGE really scored games irrespective of their platforms, we'd have expected the three lines to cross each other and be all over the place, but this is not the case. There is a strong pattern of discrimination for 360 exclusives and against PS3 exclusives." |
So in summary the big complaint is that 360 exclusives seem to be reviewed with higher scores than PS3 exclusives? Has that been checked again since the large number of Kinect exclusives as I doubt it would be quite as heavily weighted now. The simple fact is by and large most Microsoft exclusives have been very very good and the PS3 may have the same number of good exclusives but they have released far more that fall into the utter tosh bracket this gen too like for example Lair. This isn't a knock against Sony, many people prefer a large variety of genres and games and choose to make their own mind up. Oh well, I guess if it's such an issue PS3 owners should just ignore them, it's not like one score has a huge effect on anyone's enkoyment or the metacritic average.