pezus said:
Deoz said:
yet,i feel Mag achieved a littl more what BF3 should have been. DICE concentrated so much from the begining to make the game the best in graphics that sacrificed other qualities of the game itself.I would have understand if it were a pc game that was ported to consoles by dumbing it down, but the game looks like it was built for consoles from the beggining on PC. Why not make a game that could have been great on consoles and then updating it later on PC, why not try to achieve this big maps that made BF2 great, the equal big powerful vehicles that still rquired somr skill or actually making teamwork easier and more rewarding first? I know there should be a balance between gameaply and graphics, but the later didnt make it for all the things that i was dissapointed with it even on PC, it was a step back for me and could have been fixed without extra hardware...The destructable enviroments didnt affect much gameplay in BF3 i would say it was more noticeable on BC.
Dynamic enviroments, better framerate and high poly counts wont outweigh level design, skill reward, content and other gameplay elements. These could be improved already. Better hardware can lead to better things for sure, my point is i dont think it will really be used by devs given they performance this gen.
Also wit this rumors Ps4 woulkd have cross voice chat easily. No need to go overboard.
|
You're missing the point. With better hardware and more power, the devs can much more easily have more destruction, more open environments etc. BF3 can't have it all on the limited consoles. MAG looks average or even sub-par. It sacrificed graphics for player count. With more power, that would not need to happen and games could have better graphics with more open environments, better AI, more destruction etc.
|
As i said , it's about a balance, i didnt said Mag get it right either but overall the feeling of big fghts was better for me than bf3. They could have bigger maps by sacrificing graphics and still be a decent looking game,vehicles could have been a little more skilled based without any sacrifice, teamwork could have improved too, and destruction could still being the same like it was in BC were the safespots were minimal and added some gameplay value. When you make a game that focuses on graphics on 2 platformas that are apart so much form each other in that field both will probably suffer if you are seraching for the middle ground. Your point is right, but my point is that devs might not use this hardware to give new possibilities, just improve technical aspects of games, and maybe just some of them.This is my view given how i saw this gen, cant say it's wrong or right, It depends entirely on devs.
