Jay520 said:
Netyaroze said:
Jay520 said: @Net You make an interesting case and you've definitely swayed my stance a bit. But I still see lean towards the no-free-will side. I can see that free will is possible but it doesn't seem more likely than a determalistic. The only thing that free will has going for it is "there are other things in the universe that don't make sense, so free will 'could' exist too". Now, I don't know if it exists or not, but if the only thing that suggests it's existence is the fact that it could exist, then it's not very compelling. I still see the determinalistic as more probable. |
Ah but they make sense just not common sense :D
|
True. We humans probably don't have the capacity never know for sure. It's kind of hard to accept that though. |
Yes, I know that feeling all too well.