How to disprove free will using basic logic

General Discussion - How to disprove free will using basic logic - View Post

IIIIITHE1IIIII

Currently Offline

35,796

7932 posts since 14/01/12

Recent Badges:

Don't Forget To Save 10 status updates.
12 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 12 years.
9 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 9 years.
Site Veteran Has been a VGChartz member for over 5 years.
3 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 3 years.
Littlest Genocide 1,000 posts on the gamrConnect forums.

IIIIITHE1IIIII on 16 April 2012

Euphoria14 said:

IIIIITHE1IIIII said:

If it is not determined then it has to be random. Otherwise it would be determined!

Why can't it just be that those "random acts" were in fact acts of free will? Why can't it be that those 'determined" acts were also acts of free will?

To me it just sounds like you use something you can grasp an argument around and claiming it as predetermined and everything you have no answer for you simply shrug your shoulders and say "Well, I have no idea, so let's just call it random".

It has to be random if it's not determined, that is the basic logic I'm talking about.

And the free will cannot be random or determined if it wants to remain free.

Delete Shortcut Create Shortcut
View Post

Existing User Log In

New User Registration

General Discussion - How to disprove free will using basic logic - View Post

Recent Badges: