How to disprove free will using basic logic

[IIIIITHE1IIIII]

BasilZero said:

In the case of a higher being, what if I say the events that are occurring are indeed random and natural but not affected by a higher being? What if the higher being is a spectator.

For an example, a person has a ant farm, the person watches the ants through the glass case but doesnt do anything that would affect the case, the farm or the ants themselves. Whatever happens such as a section falling off and dropping on ants or w/e, was all just by randomness affected more than likely by natural occurences such as Gravity? What would you say to that?

I would simply say that it was determined that the section would fall since weak section + gravity = section falling.