How to disprove free will using basic logic

[IIIIITHE1IIIII]

pezus said:

IIIIITHE1IIIII said:

But the thing is that there is always a reason for your "decisions". If those reasons are determined, then so is your "free" will. If those reasons are not determined, then they have randomly occured (as opposed to occuring following a pattern), thus making your "free" will based on radom events.

Free means independent, so it can't be dependent on randomness.

 

(You better read all of this, Basil!)

There are always reasons. I think no one says there's never a reason for us doing something, why would we need a brain then? >_>

You just confirmed my statement.