Kasz216 said:
Oh I agree with all of that, except the last part. The large difference currently is that Palestine isn't a nation. Other nations existence are less disputable because they are currently nations. An "flipped" example would be something like Kosovo. Which was disputable as a nation, then became one, and now it a nation. This is slightly different since more or less Palestine is more of a "no mans land" then it is a part of Israel, but it's closer then compaing Palestine to say Greece, later Kosvo or even something like South Ossetia.
What Palestine needs to do is make a public "Sweetheart" deal like in the Palestine papers and say "this is our deal, it's completely onesided against us, but we just want peace." Israel would more or less be pressured to accept by everyone. However they CAN'T do that because there people have generally been lied to about what a deal would look like and that they were fairly even bargaining partners. Thoughts that the Palestine papers might be true was enough to force negotiatior resignations. As it stands, it's a no win situation... because Hamas gains political power from the status quo, and Fatah would lose power if they made a deal that could actually get done or revealed just how weak their barganning plan is.
It's all political cowardness. |
That's why i've been saying for a long time that it's Israel that needs to be the one to man up and double down. Boot the illegal settlers and then agree to a land-swap on the remaining settlements. The only real negative pressure against Israel is the rocket attacks from Gaza, however, which are more or less a non-issue, and thus why Israel won't back down and will continue strangling Palestine until there is a second Intifada, which they'll use as an excuse to deport them all.

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







