Munkeh111 said:
There are suitable alternatives, but only if everyone you want to contact has the app, and given most of my friends have dumb phones, texting is a lot easier |
Exactly. You're paying money to access a network. A very extensive network that almost everybody has access to. It's very powerful to be able to send a near-instant message to almost anybody with a phone.
Voice is not a complete substitute. It's often more expensive to deliver a message over voice (despite how profitable text plans are), often slower (think of how much time you spend waiting for the other end to pick up, exchanging pleasantries, going off topic), and more likely to interrupt whatever the recipient is doing.
Texts are a massive profit generator for carriers, true, but people wouldn't keep paying for them if they weren't a valuable service. Your professor who refuses to pay for such a service is limiting his communications tools. Maybe he doesn't need another another communication channel, but that doesn't make the rest of us suckers for paying for a cheaper, faster, and more courteous way to send a short message.

"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.







