Viper1 said:
My point is 3 fold. A) 2 8 core Power7 CPu's would be far too hot, far too big and far too expensive. B) A 16 core IBM chip already exists. The PowerPC A2. C) If you have 2 CPU's you don't necessarily count the cores together and call it a X core CPU. You would say 2 X core CPU's. The fact they speak in singuarl with regard the CPU suggests it's not a multiple CPU configuration which again leads back to B. |
A) Yes.
B) OK, did not know. That does make a lot of sense. Two smaller 8 core non-Power7 chips are also an option, so it could be consistent with that.
C) Definitely wrong. Go and look at Intel Core 2 Quad "Kentsfield". That was two CPU dies connected on package and NO ONE ever called it "two CPUs".







