Viper1 on 03 April 2012
1. Contradictory information from developers that have publicly given their names.
2. Component details that suggest more power.
3. HTPC based market products that are more powerful.
4. Bulk manufacturing of products with more power (means lower costs of more powerful products).
5. Anonymous quote lingo sounds fishy (developer tech heads don't speak like the quotes do).
6. Simple logic of known technical facets do not agree with anonymous quotes (shader 4.1 producing fewer shader capabilities than shader model 3.0 at same clock rate?).
Do I need to go on?
The rEVOLution is not being televised
