dallas said:
1. Android requires less phone memory allowing the phones to pack more in and still have more left for the customer 2. Android doesn't charge carriers to use its product. The advertising model that was mentioned may just be the better idea. 3. Android has waaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyy more apps, so the carriers will know that they will get a lot more money by encouraging android sales |
1. I have no idea if this is true or not, but I don't understand how it impacts WinPho7's relationship with carriers.
2. Whichever phone a carrier buys, there is a cost to licensing the OS, even Android requires a license for Google apps and various smartphone patents. Which OS is actually cheaper to license is priviliged information which I've never seen disclosed and may vary from case to case.
3. This is a tricky one, because carriers want to sell people on huge data packages, then discourage people from actually using them. They love to collect the toll, hate to pay the money to build out their network when it gets too congested and angry customers complain. So if Android users do consume more data than WinPho users, that may actually be a disadvantage in the mindset of a carrier. The perfect OS for a carrier would be one that convinces users to buy an expensive data plan, then somehow prevents them from ever using it.

"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.







