Mass Effect 3 metacritic score should be audited

[yo_john117]

GaaraD.Dragon said:

yo_john117 said:

GaaraD.Dragon said:

sales2099 said:
Whiny fans think the score should change.

Objective reviewers stick by their guns. The game is a masterpiece.

Sure BUT as the thread starter said, it is more than reasonable to point out that a lot of the reviewers did NOT finish the entire game at the time they wrote the review.

I have a really hard time believing that. I could see a few reviewers doing that but the majority couldn't have not finished the game.

Let's take a random day one review for closer examination.

"Its a solid game for me, with minor flaws. The flaws thats in the game is overshadowed by the great story. The game I think has more RPG elements than the 2:nd instalment but not as much as the first one. But it enough i think."

As i said I am not a Mass Effect expert but i just cannot call a story that ends with generic sci fy vagueness great !

Im not saying it deserves a 0 /10 or that it negates all the hard work put by Bioware either but when it comes to a story and decision driven game it's a big point minus.

That doesn't prove anything though, especially since your's and his opinions can differ. 

The difference between reviewers and most people who played ME3 is the reviewers take into account the whole game and don't fixate on one spot that many feel is bad (not all find it even bad mind you)