Mr Khan said:
The difference is that much less noise will be made on the matter if the President isn't up for re-election. I mean, look at the stupid things Romney's saying about Russia now that that missile defense flap came out. This sort of thing is routine foreign policy that no-one would really care about, but the talking heads will make them care if they have a vested interest one way or another (i.e., let's boot this guy out of office). Nobody blasted Bush's handling of the Georgia-Russia thing late in his term, and it didn't even really factor in on McCain, whereas the Left would have accused him of playing nice with Putin against the interests of the Georgian people or something if the same thing had happened in 2004. |
Honestly I haven't paid an attention to a thing Romney has said for months. Outside of reading looking up the context of quotes that seem out of context just to see the proper context.
I'm more likely to vote for Roseanne Barr then I am Mitt Romney.
Mitt Romney really isn't any different then Obama in most of the issues I dislike about Obama. The only reason I'd vote for him is because when he keeps course on a number of issues Obama was moving on, mainstream Democrats will suddenly be pissed off about it again.
Most mainstream Republicans are fake fiscal conservatives, but most mainstream democrats are also fake social/anti military liberals.
A;so, Roseanne Barr is actually running for President, that wasn't a random reference or anything.








