KillerMan said:
disolitude said:
famousringo said:
Slimebeast said:
I want it to but the cold hard truth is that Windows Phone will never take on. When people have a choice they won't pick something with Windows in it because Windows just doesn't sound modern and interesting, it sounds old and it's forever associated with hassle and frustration.
|
I don't think this is the biggest problem with WinPho, but I agree it is a problem. Ballmer thinks Windows is a really powerful brand. Maybe it is in corporate IT, but as you say it comes with a lot of negative baggage in the mind of the consumer.
Ballmer needs to let go of this vision of Windows everywhere. If he'd been running things ten years ago, the Xbox might have been called "Microsoft Windows Home Standard Entertainment Edition."
|
I disagree. Windows is the Microsoft operating system and a proven brand. No reasons to change it. Windows brand sells more devices per year than iOS, Chrome, Andorid and Mac do combined.
|
Because people don't really have a choice when buying PC. It's is pretty much packed in by retailers in every sold computer.
|
And why don't they have a choice? Cause Microsoft moneyhatted all the retailers and OEMs?
Seriously though, if it was easy to do a desktop OS and support it like microsoft does, everyone would be doing it and there would be lots of choice.
Only reason Google can even compete with Microsoft on the mobile and desktop front is because they are piggybacking off advertising revenue. Android, Chrome OS, Google Docs alone would not be able to sustain Google as a business for a week.
