Are mandatory vaccinations good or bad for us?

[Nirvana_Nut85]

Mendicate Bias said:

Nirvana_Nut85 said:

No way to autheticate? If you actually read the entire article instead of claiming you did, you would have found direct links to the FDA and other sites (you do realize that the continue arrow brings you to the next screen right?)

For someone who claims they have a "BACHELOR" in biology and biotech and are pursuing a Master's it's very surprising s that you resorted to ad hominems and choose to use the type of language you did, like in the previous post. If anything, you come off more as an ignorant hillbilly then someone with any credibility at all.

Oh wait, let me guess; in your next post you will post a link directly from the A.C.S or one of those organizations, or hell maybe you'll provide me something from the W.H.O! Well I would highly suggest researching into who funds or created the majority of these organizations where alot of this scientific data comes from and who there founders were (you should already know this, considering how smart you are).

Anyways, until you can speak and act like an adult and debate intelligently without swearing or name calling, do not bother replying as I have nothing further to say to you.

Good day to you sir, and kepp drinking that kool-aid.

 

Good job picking out my one typo. For the hell of it I bolded all your grammatical mistakes, do I win?

The links that do work simply link to request forms and overviews that are protocol for stage II testing. If you understood half the words in those papers you would realize that there is no 'conspiracy'.

Furthermore in order to defend your crazy view point you attack me instead of addressing any of the points I made? I get worked up over this stuff because people like you who don't have a single shred of medical knowledge think they know the secret cure to diabetes, and that all the evil scientist are keeping the information locked away to make millions of dollars. One of the cornerstones of scientific research is reproducibility. Every claim made by any organization is looked into by countless universities and independent research firms. Heck one of my current research projects is doing exactly that. But oh no I must be getting paid millions of dollars by some shady organization to change the results of my research 

Rath explained it better than I did. You can believe whatever you want, just don't go running to a hospital when you realize your voodoo magic didn't cure your cancer or keep you from getting polio.

 

I actually didn't mean to point out your "one error" that was my spelling mistake as the keys stick to my keyboard and I've never been a fan of proof reading and could not really care whether or not I spell correctly on an internet forum :P You can still give yourself a hero biscuit for pointing my mistakes out!

Anyways, back to the conversation. You obviously still have yet to read the article and it seems more than anything you do not understand because you could not even clearly point out what you disagreed with that had any relation to the subject. The protocol for stage two testing was not a huge part, keep reading.

Instead, you once again resort to either name calling or ignorant comments  and then make assumptions of other's intellect while (hysterically) portraying yourself to be that exact persona.

Let's not forget your attempt to piggy back on other user's comments who seemed to have read the article as for some reason "Mr. On His Way To A Master's degree" could not advise "Ignorant Ol' Me" why you disagree.

P.S  The funny thing is, I use more alternative methods for staying healthy and stay away from vaccines and out of everyone I know, and I rarely gets sick compared to those who take there flu shots and follow everything the health organizations tell them to. I guess I just must be crazy !