Michael-5 said:
Magan Carta 2 was a fun game to play, but the plot wasn't really that epic, and the game pverall was far too easy. I liked the character, the giant tiger? guy who lives 600 years, and the mare. There definatly was a good amount of character development in this game. I haven't beated Infinite Undiscovery, but to me the plot seems a lot better done, and it's enjoyably difficult. If it weren't for the bugs and poor localization... As for the rest, DanneSandin if you're still reading,UltimateUnknown is right about everything except for online play. PSN is fine, and if you're like me and want to play just a bit every now and then, PSN is a better alternative over XBL because it's affordable (XBL just makes no sense if you only play a few hours online a month because you're literally paying close to $1 an hour). PS3 has a landslide victory in terms of Action Adventure games, but 360 has a strong victory in terms of WRPG's. JRPG's only give 360 a small edge because PS3 is getting some pretty cool JRPG exclusives still, where 360 is dead in Japan. |
This may be straying a bit off topic but when the heck am I ever gonna talk about this, plus its somewhat relevant lol. Yea I completed Magna Carta 2, I would agree that the game is not very difficulty, the last boss was a friggin joke lol, OP Juto and Argo (the dragon guy) quite literally just gangraped him. But to be honest I think the difficulty is fine, maybe unlocking a new difficulty ater you beat the game would have been nice. I would hate to play another Star Ocean the last hope, the last boss was so friggin difficult that I quite literally just gave up, and I never ever give up once I have gotten that far into a game but for Star Ocean I just had to. Not to mention each of the game's boss took like 30-45 minutes to beat which is ridiculous, it had a good story at least at the beginning but ruined it with insane grinding and difficulty (I was playing on normal, not even hard. I fear to wonder whats in the hardest difficulty that you unlock after you beat the game).
I started Infinite Undiscovery but just stopped playing after a while as there was nothing particularly interesting about the story or gameplay for me, hence I say MG2 is better, it had a pretty decent story that kept me second guessing and gave a very nice closure. The gameplay could be just a bit better, but it was fun nonetheless and all the characters were VERY well developed, I really felt as if I got to know each of the characters in depth and their motivations for fighting by the end of the game, which very few games do properly.
I also quite literally just got an actual SOLID copy of Tales of Vesperia from one of my friends 2 hours ago. I know you can digitally get it, but I still can't believe what I am holding, its an actual disc copy. This game goes upwards of £60 ($100) on ebay for the disc even though the game is 4 years old and my friend just had it lying around, so he lent it to me as I have been really looking forward to playing it. I thought Magna Carta 2 was hard to find after all I went through to get an actual copy of the game, but TOV is insane. So far have played a bit of it, story seems pretty solid as expected from a Tales game and the gameplay seems alright. So I'll keep on playing and see how I find it.
