| OoSnap said: Absolutely not! Have we ever observed bacteria evolve into something else other than bacteria? Nope. What about fruitflies? Nope. Still the same even after decades of fruitfly experiments. Sure the mutants have a different form and such (albeit more sickly and less fit) but they are still fruitflies. Have we ever observed a reptile evolve into a bird? Have we ever observed molecules evolve into a life form? Nope and nope. Evolution is not based on hard science but made up stories by people who spent thousands of dollars to get a title on their name. Don't be deceived. You are not the result of billions of years of evolution. That said there are hardcore skeptics who say they only believe what they see but they have never seen evolution. A cat gives birth to a cat. A dog gives birth to a dog. People give birth to humans. Yet these same skeptics believe all life evolved from some primordial cell without ever observing it. Talk about being inconsistent and loopy [[confused]] ·It takes a lot of faith to believe the evolution story. |
Maybe when humans have several thousand year life spans or outright biological immortality then we can directly witness evolution of a species. Until that happens, we will have to go off of fossil records and DNA analysis to help us construct and understand evolution as a theory.
Out of curiosity, what is your explanation for the variety of life on earth? Did life come about as a result of abiogenesis and evolution as the evidence suggests, or is there another prominent theory out there that is also rooted in reason and evidence that we are all unaware of?
Considering the fact I mentioned reason and evidence, that would exclude so called "intelligent design" so you will have to propose something else. I suppose you could argue that no current theory is sufficient as an explanation, but you will have to do a more thoroughjob discrediting evolution if you want to push that idea.
