Mr Khan said:
I'd say it's not an issue of expense, but of effort and education, for this extends not merely into how the poor are less likely to be healthy, but are less likely to vote or participate in civil society organizations (that is to say, participate in an organization independent of the government or their job, keeping the argument open that merely going to church doesn't count as participation). I recently completed an 80+ page paper on democratization, and my findings indicated as well as the research i cited indicates that the greater your economic hardship is, the less likely you are to be able to dispose of your free time in anything, i'll have to say, productive (whether that is getting in shape or pushing for political reform in your community) Part of it is cultural, of course. Those who are born poor may enter into a culture of poverty that places less emphasis on self-betterment, but i still move that the lack of motivation is environmental and generally not due to the decisions of the individual. The expense of eating healthy is indeed overstated (unless we want to say that organic only is eating healthy, and even then organic alternatives are not that prohibitive), but the effort that it takes to compile base ingredients into a meal when the roughly-equal-cost bucket of chicken is available at KFC, and available right now, is more daunting. I'll note that it happened to my cousin, too. She finally got a job in April 2010, and i noted by Thanksgiving of that year that she had rather let herself go, which was likely because of the drastic loss of free time that comes with full-time employment compared to the 9-months of post-graduation job-hunting that she did. The pressures of time are a real factor for the working poor. |
I would personally argue that time management skills and prioritization are two key factors in the success or failure of people throughout history; and the poor would be disproportionately made up of people with poor time management and prioritization skills.







