Scoobes said:
zero129 said:
ishiki said:
SlumsofOhio said:
@lestatdark
I think your confusing the endings as a single choice. You had the rachni choice (means nothing in ME3), and you had the decision to save (or kill) the council at the end of one. Now if I finished ME3 (which I did) would I take the time to go back and change anything? Its sad when I can have the worst possible outcomes in both ME1 and ME2, and all It takes is an hour of multiplayer to get the best endings. |
as I've stated above, mass effects continually done this through all 3 games. It does mean something because you can get the rachni queen to join your army. Which if you kill her it doesn't. And if I recall you don't get her quest.
Now is it silly you can negate it in multiplayer. yes. There are many slight variations as I posted above. What it is, is unbalanced, and most people just play multiplayer to get the best ending. And the best endings the same.
For instance galactic readiness, determines whether earth is destroyed or not. If you completely negate every quest. The readiness meter is done rather poor. But in theory this should have worked better than it did.
|
No matter what ending you get earth is destroyed in the ME3 ending. As like i said already if you played the arrivel DLC for ME2 you would see that destorying a Mass Relay destorys that whole galaxy.
|
I haven't played Arrival, but you sure you mean galaxy?
Sure you don't mean solar system or cluster?
|
Its definitely solar system. And we don't even know if the explosion from the Mass Relay in the Sol System (Earth) would actually destroy Earth since the Mass Relay is so very far away from Earth and not every Solar System is the same size so just because it destroyed the solar system in the Arrival DLC doesn't mean the Mass Relay will destroy Earth (this is also directed at Mr. Zero)
Essay Pro