The Racist history of the Republican Party

[Allfreedom99]

Rath said:

Allfreedom99 said:

 

My point is that when a fetus is conceived it is considered human life.  It imediately begins to develop as a human. anyone saying that the clump of cells in the beginning or fetus is not a human life then they are denying the truth. A conceived fetus is not going to develop into a dog, a kangaroo, or algea. It becomes a human and as such develops as a human through the process in the womb where it is protected.

If then by this how is it different if I end an adult human life in a coma but alive and noone knows them from ending a human life in the womb before it is birthed?

Alive but in a coma is still a person. They have a consciousness, it just happens to not be running in standby mode at that point in time.

A fetus does not have a consciousness. It has not developed and in the early stages of pregnancy has not even started to develop yet.

I understand what you are trying to say and have me see your position on it. It may not have a concious in the beginning, but it is still human life with human DNA.

If I told you that I got a woman pregnant and said I was going to be the father of a mushroom plant once its born you would say, "you are mentally strange". Thats because you know that the moment I got a woman pregnant it means me and a woman have created a human life through my sperm and her egg. It may not have a concious in the beginning, but it quickly will within weeks and Inevitably will be birthed into the world as human.

All that to say....If its ok to end that human life before it develops a concious then it Must be ok to end that human life once it is more developed in the womb, or after its birthed, or heck when its a young child. Either way human life is being ended. Whether its before it develops a concious or after.