crissindahouse said:
thranx said:
crissindahouse said:
Roma said:
I wonder if people think men are gay because they walk on the beach with other topless men 
|
if it would be only on the beach but every second is topless in the own garden everyone can look at. next time i will use a jacket in the sun because there are people under 18 who pass my garden
i understand now what they mean with "huge porn industry but very prude in real life"
i mean, i have two guys and a little girl with GUNS in my sig and really nobody would care about that but if i would have a woman with bikini or man topless it would be "too much" and "this site is meant for people under 18 as well"
that's crazy! yeah they aren't real but what's with a pic of rambo with a weapon or so? nobody would care! what's our nature, born naked or a weapon in the hand?
|
sigs can be blocked. I think many people do this alreday because sigs are so long, and many just dont look good while browsing. There is no option to block avatars. That is all we need.
|
that wasn't my message. my message was that 90% of people who don't like those bikini pics or guy pics wouldn't say anything against rambo or a pic of a gun. the otionn to block an avatar pic as well like the sig is legitimate, no prob with that.
|
thats your opinion. I can see people not wanting drugs, violence or sex displayed on a gaming site they browse. I can understand their view for that also. I know this thread was created because of the half naked guys/girls but violence and drugs are in the same catergory. We should have an option to not to display avatars. Or have the rules for them more clearly written. It seems like it would be ok to have stuff in sigs/avatars that wouldn't be ok if it was put in a thread or post. (not counting the NSFW section here)
