averyblund said:
Squilliam said:
This thread is essentially a penis measuring contest between pre-pubescent boys.
|
The nerd rage is strong in this thread indeed. No wonder the Chartz board seems to get deader and deader every year. Between low -res JPEGs and GIFs (really? 2012?) used to prove their points, I'm just glad real life has people with better things to do than debate minute differences between dated hardware platforms. Why not revive the GC v. Xbox v. PC debate at this rate? I'd much rather hear about the games, and why they are better. If graphics defined gaming nobody would game on anything but a PC, but obviously the wide range of gameplay afforded by consoles draws in the masses. So why bother fighting over this silly shit. I highly doubt in 15 years looking back if the differences between 360 or PS3 will even be noticable.
Only gameplay survives for decades. They will all look like crap in 10 years.
|
Yep. The PS3 turns 6 and the Xbox 360 turns 7 this year, who-wuddathunk-it that people would still be going on about them to this day. Anyway as always the credit ought to be going to the developers, not the silly systems that they develop the games for because besides anything else if you really cared about graphics to this day and aren't a major PC gamer then something is seriously wrong with you.
