Christhor said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
Christhor said:
leper-apostle said:
Ajescent said:
Christhor said:
Whoa, I can play CoD, AC and Resistance on ONE device? I might have been blown away by this, if not for the fact that my Ps3 can already play supperior versions of all those games. |
QFT
|
Resistance Burning skies is vita only, How will, the PS3 version be superior? Theya re basically the same. You cannot take you r PS3 with you, you know the entire point of a portable LMAO. How do you know Creed will be available on PS3? Could be an entirely different game ala golden Abyss, same as COD.
|
Burning Skies will just be a worse version of Resistance 3. Golden Abyss is a much worse version of Uncharted 3, the rest will probably be the same.
And really, taking a handheld with you outside? I thought people stopped doing that after they turned ten.
|
Actually Golden abyss is a lot more like the first Uncharted, nothing like Uncharted 3, and it's fantastic. It's a brilliant way to bridge the story between 1 and 2 and it's a brilliant game on it's own.
And many people use handhelds when they're travelling (train, bus, plane), including myself.
Do you even know what you're talking about?
|
Case in point: Uncharted 1 was a worse version of Uncharted 3.
I'm just saying, if you aren't able to leave your games at home when going outside, you probably have the mind of an eight year old.
|
What? These games aren't versions of eachother. They're different games in the same series. The first Uncharted isn't a "worse version of uncharted 3", It's not a version of Uncharted 3, it's its own game, with it's own storyline. Going by your logic, everyone should only play the latest game in the series, as it's the best "version", even though all games are part of an overall storyline and have their own merits.
So people have the mind of an eight year old because they want to pass the time on their commute by playing a video game?
