By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
IIIIITHE1IIIII said:

[Firstly, I'm glad that you keep this discussion at a civilized level.]

 


That was 1500 years ago, you should never trust information that's that old. Especially when considering that the source to all this has heavily skewed the info (or made all this up as far as we know) to match with the "perfect religion". An objective source would help out a lot here, but as for now, we're stuck.

Fair enough. You have a polarized view on Islam so I won't try explaining further because you're entitled to your own beliefs. However, please note that calling Muhammad a pedophile IS wrong, and it is extremely disrespectful. You can choose not to believe in him, but at the same time please don't try to down-grade his character by making false claims that have no evidence to back them up. At least we have the Haddith that tells the type of character Muhammad was. Calling him a pedophile or a slave owner is wrong in context to the Haddith, and it is wrong in context of his historical role and the movement of liberty that he was pursuing (which is historically documented outside of the Quran and Haddith).