A 1080p display that size is nothing but a waste of processor cycles. You're burning power and losing framerate to draw pixels you need a microscope to see. So this is either fake or Samsung is getting stupid (or chasing after customers who are gullible).
As for the mighty debate of quads vs. duals, I submit to you the Tegra 3, barely edging out an A5 in CPU performance and still lagging in GPU performance:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5163/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-nvidia-tegra-3-review/2
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5163/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-nvidia-tegra-3-review/3
Bragging about your number of cores is just like bragging about your jiggahurts. It's the real world performance of the whole architecture that counts. Will it render a web page faster? Run games with a better framerate? Save your battery life?
There needs to be a clever word for this speed and feed pornography.
"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.
