Mr Khan said:
You assume greater mobility of people than is actually the case. While there would be some movement in the margins, populations gains/loss from education quality can't be that significant. Florida is apparently known for fairly poor educational standards, yet they keep gaining population Which is the whole practical problem with all "competition will sort itself out" arguments, simply that people are not as mobile as they "should" be for such systems to really work. |
This seems like a strange arguement, here you are arguing
1) There is lots of economic mobility to Florida despite their poor education scores.
2) There is not a lot of mobility.
Seems contradicting. Outside which, though Florida is ranked poorly in achivement. Standards wise it is one of the highest ranked schools.
I can't really speak of florida, but I can speak of Nevada. One of the worst states education wise. Most people with kids either flees or puts their kids in charter schools if they can avoid it.
Yet still saw plenty of population growth due to construction jobs and illegal immigration. AS such, the tax base has kinda collapsed, Nevada is in huge debt... can't attract buisnesses because it's workers education is poor... etc.








