Kasz216 said:
Because... they do. Without specific requirements, states that do poorly have no excuse vs states that do try, and people will leave the states that do poorly. ESPIECALLY with health. I mean, what company is going to stay in a state with bad healthcare if a better one is right across the state lines? The states with better healthcare should attract more buisnesses and people because they won't have to pay for it. Though if you wanted incentives vs the states... there is plenty of things you can do... like withold other money. Just how the highway money is often used to blackmail states. |
You assume greater mobility of people than is actually the case. While there would be some movement in the margins, populations gains/loss from education quality can't be that significant. Florida is apparently known for fairly poor educational standards, yet they keep gaining population
Which is the whole practical problem with all "competition will sort itself out" arguments, simply that people are not as mobile as they "should" be for such systems to really work.

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







