badgenome said:
There is already a cap on donations. Citizens United changed none of that. Again, all the Supreme Court decided in Citizens United is that the government can't infringe on the free expression of a group of people just because it's "too close" to an election or primary. So it is pretty clearly 100% about speech, and not at all about money. Actually, I'd say it's all about politics. The same people who think allowing Hillary: The Movie to be aired or advertised within 30 days of a primary undermines the republic seemed to have no trouble whatsoever with Fahrenheit 9/11 being advertised and released on DVD within 30 days of the 2004 presidential election. |
I wasn't aware that was what was at issue. I had assumed citizens united was about the ability of corporations to donate to Super PACs without limitations, anonymously.

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







