By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

@ Kasz216

PS3 should have a much higher attach rate then 360. Not just a slightly higher attach rate when it comes to individual games.


Why?

I think the 360 should have a much higher attach rate, because:

1) The system has been out longer, it shoud for example be expected people who had their 360 for 2 years in Europe bought more games during this period than someone who owned the PS3 for 9 months.

2) The most highly anticipated 360 games are already out on the market, such as Gears of War and Halo 3. The most anticipated games for the PS3 are yet to come, many of which this year. Sony so far mainly experimented with introducing new franchises, at which Motorstorm and Resistance already are successful sellers.

3) More games released so far.

 With regard to COD 3 specifically, I noticed the many hardcore PS3 gamers getting a system around launch also owned a 360 and for the PS3 version they would have had to wait 10 more days (+ rumours that the 360 version was superior).



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales