pezus said:
RolStoppable said:
pezus said:
RolStoppable said:
I mean just that. You simply shouldn't assume that a minor sample on the internet is representative of the real world. People get asked about their purchases and if it's worth to buy the thing in question. Or they talk about their purchases without being asked, because they think that they own something awesome. But good people don't tell their friends to spend money on something they aren't really happy with.
Right now in Japan many people aren't happy with their Vita, that's why hardly any good word of mouth spreads. The same thing happened to the 3DS about a year ago. But this is irrelevant for a comparison that looks at the current state of things.
|
In that case, consumer satisfaction for the Wii is low but that directly stems from a lack of appealing new games. Sales do not determine quality, quality determines sales. So games is really the main factor here, and it is included above.
|
You got that right about the Wii.
The problem with the games category in the article you posted is that it's just the opinon of one single person. Sales however, give us a chance to look at a more general consensus, because every sale represents a person.
This probably requires me to type out a pre-emptive argument when it comes to software sales. There needs to be a distinction made between impulse buy range and purchases that require consideration. So for example, a game like Angry Birds cannot be compared equally to a 3DS/Vita retail game. That's obvious, but I always have to expect Joelcool7 reading my posts.
|
I simply disagree with you. Things can be utter crap but still sell very well. The correlation between sales and quality is random at best.
|
I agree with you. I don't think most people would say that Toyota makes better cars than BMW because they sell more cars than BMW does.
