Those of you saying the Vita should score the same as the 3DS are clearly charged by bias. 3DS set the standard. It launched at $250 with tech that is objectively worse than the Vita's, you can't really sugarcoat that. I fail to see why it should be given the same score, its new $170 price is absolutely irrelevant.
But hey if you want to feel better Cnet gave the 3DS a better score because the iphone is better than the Vita. I wish I was joking but that's essentially how the journalist justified his reasoning.







