Who Killed Rare?

[IIIIITHE1IIIII]

angrypoolman said:

IIIIITHE1IIIII said:

angrypoolman said:

Seece said:
In a commercial sense they're more alive than they have been in a long time, completely stupid to say they're dead.

If you're talking about the creativity and output there, then it's been a slow decline, but MS did give it a bash early this gen. They can't be expected to keep greenlighting profitless projects, heaven forbid Microsoft act like a business.

says the 360 fanboy.

anybody else notice this guy's posts are incredibly biased? i mean, i know mine are too, but at least i dont try to pretend theyre not. his fanboyism is so bad that he believes that rare is more alive than they have been in a long time.

more alive compared to when? the last 5+ years they were dead?

Well, he said "in a long time", which is true since Kinect Sports outsells Rare's last Nintendo games.

 

It's not about bias, it's about opinions.

so instead of making classics that will be remembered and loved by many they are making.. kinect sports. yeah.. rare is dead.

I know it's not really fair to respond to a banned profile, but at least I'm saying this very sentence first.

 

Anyways, kids growing up playing Kinect Sports beg to differ, just like I do when people say Rare's early works weren't memorable.