happydolphin said:
From thefreedictionary.com: 2. Of large size for its weight: a bulky knit. Sorry, I thought I posted that before... I bold-italics-underlined it for you just in case, hope that helps. I understand now, you have some kind of visual impairment. Why didn't you tell me sooner? Anyways, I'll do my best to stay clear despite your disability, but just remember I'm not a fucking charity and value my time.
1. Having considerable bulk; massive. 2. Of large size for its weight: a bulky knit. 3. Clumsy to manage; unwieldy.
It's comparisons. Also, the first character of a new sentence is capitalized. @italics. They may, but they don't. Since the ipad and the Wii U controller both sport very similar width-height dimensions, the smaller the weight, the less bulky, since bulky refers to it being too large for its application. For instance, if the ipad were lighter for the same application, would you consider it bulkier? No you would not, because bulky doesn't apply when an application requires a given dimension. A bike made of composite is considered bulkier than a bike made of steel? I'm sorry, it is not. Bulky is valid only in a context where the application does not dictate size. In this case, Application does dictate size, so the lighter, the better. It can't be said it's more bulky because it's lighter, in this specific context.
Again, wrong see above. It wouldn't be considered bulky in a context where a given size is required. Making it lighter is a benefit more than anything and cannot be considered bulkier for that matter.
If you used your brain and your eyes, you would be able to judge. This is exacty what I expected from you. EDIT: Oh, damn. Sorry... I forgot about your visual impairment. Forgive my indecency.
No, it corroborates to your lack of logic and his lack of intelligence. See my first quote-box above. |
"Sorry, I thought I posted that before... I bold-italics-underlined it for you just in case, hope that helps. I understand now, you have some kind of visual impairment. Why didn't you tell me sooner?"
does this mean you disagree with the defintion?
"Since the ipad and the Wii U controller both sport very similar width-height dimensions"
yeah they do but the wii u is without a doubt much thicker than the ipad so assuming their weights are similar
( impressions of the wii u controller have been without the battery so far so it may be heavier )
the wii u is without a doubt bulkier as it has a larger volume for its weight
"A bike made of composite is considered bulkier than a bike made of steel? "
actually according to the definition yes... if indeed composite is a denser material and therefore heavier for the same volume edit ( i actually mean't less dense and lighter )
"Making it lighter is a benefit more than anything and cannot be considered bulkier for that matter"
absolutely wrong, from your point its clear that you make the assumption that being bulky is a disavantage in any situation
which is not true, being bulky can vary from being an advantage to being a disavantage given the right situation
