By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Khuutra said:
sethnintendo said:
Mad55 said:

I really dont see the point in you saying you have more gaming experience than me that means nothing in this conversation. I know people who are my same age and think differently about dlc tha me. I mean really mass effect 2 had good dlc and  i expect 3 to follow. Also I never tried to influecne you I just gave my opinion. 

What I meant was the younger generation accepts DLC more.  The old guard usually doesn't like DLC.  When I mean old guard I mean those that started on Atari 2600 or NES not PS1, PS2 or xbox.

That's untrue. I started in the third gen myself and I'm not offended by DLC at all, so long as it is a supplement to a full and rich experience - like ME2's DLC was. Most DLC buyers are our age or older, I would think.


Yea, well those are HD consoles owners mainly.  Ask any Nintendo only or most PC gamers I assume don't have favorable view of DLC.  What DLC is a publisher wanting extra money.  Instead of including a level creator or something like that they decide to sell it.  Users can create better content than most developers.  Don't believe me? Then go to CivFanatics and check out some scenarios for all the Civ games.  The top user made scenarios either match or trump anything that the developers of the game can put out.  I see DLC as a rip off because I am used to user made content.  Sorry just how I feel and it will never change because I know how much the users can create with what little the developer usually gives them to create with.