By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
VGKing on 08 February 2012
Edit Thread
RolStoppable said:
VGKing said:

It's common sense that portables and more expensive than non-portables.

For example, for $1000 you can get a high end laptop. For those same $1000 you can get a desktop PC that is MUCH better and will let you play the latest games for many more years than that laptop.

Um, yeah. The logical conclusion would be that a gamer buys the desktop, especially if the games library is equal. So the laptop loses out. You know what device the laptop in this analogy is.


There's plenty of gamers that maybe don't have the space for a high-end desktop or are just always on the move.

For that gamer, laptops are the only option.

Some people would love to have a PS3 but they know they wouldn't have time to play it much. Vita is a great alternative. 

Just because you game only on a portable it doesn't mean you're not a real gamer. In fact, you might be more of a gamer than the typical PS3 owner.