Jumpin said:
True, but if a publication wants to appear as a credible objective source; one actually worth reading, then they should appear both credible and objective; which they very obviously do not in this case. When you have review standards like the ones displayed here, scores and reviews become completely meaningless; ultimately it undermines the purpose of the review section. |
Reviews do not need to be objective.
Tell me: what is the purpose of the review section?