| greenmedic88 said: I can't say I feel much sympathy for this woman or her "starving" kid. Re-write that to say "Woman tazed for disrupting business, refusal to leave premises, criminal trespass, failure to obey lawful order of law enforcement officer and most likely, resisting arrest."
|
greenmedic I think I love you lol. It is this exactly. She wasn't tazed for cutting in line. She refused to leave the premises of a business, disrupted business, refused to comply with police orders and possibly abusing an officer (I imagine the reason he was struggling to remove her from the car was she was being abusive)
She got exactly what she deserved. When caught cutting in line she should have apologised for the trouble she caused and either joined the back of the line or parked and gone inside.
Oh and also if her child is 'starving' then she shouldn't be a mother and the child should be taken into care. Clearly she has enough money for a quite nice car but she has chosen to not feed her child to the point of starvation...Oh wait or maybe what she actually meant was the child was hungry and being petulant and as a terrible mother she thought it would be best to inconvenience an entire business, multiple people and make the police waste their time on such a petty issue.







