I can't say I feel much sympathy for this woman or her "starving" kid.
The title doesn't say it all either. "Mother tazed for cutting in line."
Re-write that to say "Woman tazed for disrupting business, refusal to leave premises, criminal trespass, failure to obey lawful order of law enforcement officer and most likely, resisting arrest."
The real story probably went something like this: woman zips into line at the cut out exit (just before the order intercom/menu), customers in line start yelling or honking, manager comes outside to see what the commotion is about, customers complain about the line jumper, manager tells woman to pull in to the back of the line, woman refuses and eventually shuts her engine off, blocking the line, manager calls police, police arrive and tell woman to move her vehicle, woman refuses, woman is now trespassing yet still ignores repeated orders to vacate premises by law enforcement officer, woman receives final warning which is also ignored, woman gets tazed and is removed from premises.
This is exactly like the story I read earlier this week titled "Man tazed for walking dog without leash" which should have been titled "Man tazed for violating leash law, failure to obey park official, providing false information to said park official and attempting to flee scene."
The story was the guy was walking his dog without a leash in violation of the park leash law and then gave the park ranger a fake name (wasn't carrying any ID) when he was confronted and then ignored the park official's repeated commands to stop (lawful arrest) and attempted to leave the scene.
