This isn't a problem with Runa in particular, but rather the entire reviewing process. The scores at the end of reviews need to be eliminated. Reviews are opinions, and nothing more. However when that score is latched on there it represents the entire website. "Yeah, Edge, and VGChartz thought that game was a piece of shit!" While that may not be the case because there may be many people who do enjoy it.
I don't understand Runas take on value because Final Fantasy IX can be finished in what 11 hours? X-2 took me about 22. Hell there are FPS games that take 4! So I would say 23 hours for a speeder is great. It's quite clear that she didn't put effort into doing hardly any of the side-quests, extra NMs, casino, chocobo racing, monster hunting (seriously, they even do this better than Pokemon) and the many other things that XIII-2 has to offer. Also Final Fantasy has never been a "difficult" game for the main story, the real challenge is on the post game.
It's just one persons opinion though, go look at Amazon, Gamestops, Gamefaqs user scores. They are already leaps and bounds ahead of XIIIs. So Square did something right here, if Runa believes so or not.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
