teigaga on 05 February 2012
Reading his review its quite clear why it got a low score. In most other review they find the combat to be the saving grace, where as this review just about found it enjoyable. Add in the fact that he felt the mahority of the single player is filler, it makes perfect sense he would hand it a 5-6.
Funnily enough the latter point is something i don't think reviewers point out enough. So many game narratives are spread so thin, you realise after playing for hours that you've recieved nothing in terms of a rewarding narrative. In most cases you being thrown from location, to location, looking for some illusive object only to have the core story develop at distant intervals.
