happydolphin said:
You don't need to answer any of them actually. It took me 8 pages of back and forth with o_O.Q until I finally settled with Torillian that Nintendo didn't base the N64 design off the vectrex, Sony didn't copy Nintendo's technology, but sony followed Nintendo's lead (copied their business idea, not the tech). Let's see how long it takes for you to bring them out of denial for this one. And it's all hypothetical anyways (drafts of patents and whatnot, nothing official.) One thing is certain, is that if Sony also releases a controller to its next system with a large embedded screen with wireless image streaming and touch controls, you can be sure the business idea is a direct retaliation to Nintendo's business move. Of course, they aren't copying the tech per se (that tech already existed long ago, and I even predicted the tech used in the WiiU controller before it even was revealed, due to my basic background in computer networking.) No, it would be the business idea that's being copied. Copy copy copy - paste, go Kitler, make it pretty! |
See this makes more sense, and if SOny does put some funky screen on their next system or have somehting like a controller, ill be the first to eat crow with hot sauce. The problem with the OP is he has his nuts in a bee hive over a patent, he has no idea what SONY will do for their next console, no one does, no proof that SOny will copy WIi U tablet. And he continues to ignore the Remote Play function of PSP which is not hat different from Wii U. Now if he said, "SOny patent MIGHT lead to similar WIi U function" that wouldnt be so bad