Besides being a TL;DR post, the premises on which you argue against evolutionary theory, especially through the links you used, is just too disingenuous. Firstly, blogs do not count as peer reviewed and published material. Hell, we'd still be in the stone age if that format was used to advance the sciences. Also, the legitimate webites you posited as proof have very good articles, except for the fact that in true creationist scheming, you take out of context what the whole of the articles say. I have dealt with your kind for decades now and not one shred of proof has ever been submitted proving otherwise, except for those who twist valid scientific data around for their purposes of supporting an agenda, that not being of true scientific research. Creationists have no valid means or research methods to prove what cannot be proved, that pseudo-science somehow really works.
Here's simple question and I know for a fact you won't get the answer, as humble as it pertains across the scientific community:
What is the one thing that "real" science strives to be when gathering data and (in any sciencific research) as to get the theories and facts correct for their postulations?
I bet when you answer it wrong and I tell you, it will raise some eyebrows at how ridiculous this (your) argument is, when nothing but straw men are used to prop up your pseudo-science.
