Sony PlayStation Vita review - 4.5/5

[d0nni3]

RolStoppable said:

d0nni3 said:

"Let’s not beat around the bush; we like the PlayStation Vita, we like it a lot. In fact, we’re happy to say that we have never fallen for a handheld games console as much as we have the PS Vita. It is to hardcore gamers what a Penny Black is to a philatelist."

They said they liked it.................... what fanboys..... :/ does that mean that every review that praises a game is biased or anyone that praises hardware is biased have you not thought to yourself for one second that they might just have really liked it

The reviewer also said this in the opening segment:

 

That’s not to say that the PS Vita is without fault, however. Like any piece of consumer electronics, it sports a caveat party hat: The front and rear cameras are 640 x 480 (VGA), so merely functional at best; attempting to play with the much-discussed multi-touch pad around the back is the gaming equivalent of patting your head and rubbing your tummy; the battery life of roughly three hours for straight gameplay, five for media playback isn't great (although better than the 3DS); and loading times for games can be painfully slow, regardless of the fact that they are stored on media with no moving parts.

But we don’t care. Indeed, we care so little about these minor foibles that we’ve started the review backwards in order to get them out of the way. Job done, now on with the show...

Emphasis: mine. Liking something is okay, but quickly shoving negative points out of the way to have more space to talk up the product is not. A review should be a comprehensive evalution of the good and the bad, not either one or the other.

Mine??

look i've made my point i'm going to bang my head against a wall for a bit now might actually get somewhere with that