pezus said:
ninty_shareholder64 said:
pezus said:
ninty_shareholder64 said:
Zlejedi said:
radishhead said:
I'm not sure- he gives a big list of all the handhelds he owned, but he only provides negative comments when talking about the DS/3DS and says almost wholly positive things about the Vita, while giving backhanded complements to the PS3 in the meantime ("almost as good as the PS3") - combined with his very strong opinions ("best handheld ever" after a month? Seriously?), he doesn't sound like a particularly credible source. |
And what would those mysterious hardware advantages be that DS or 3DS have ?
Battery life for DS and ... ?
|
games worth paying those 300$+.
|
That's not hardware. The author is definitely talking about the hardware and features. Have you forgotten the 3DS situation before the price cut and Mario?
|
Well, without proper software that uses the advantages of the hardware, what's the point of superp hardware? I just wanted to point out, that the best handheld ever should be defined by the software, even when talking about hardware. Sounds weird? Perhaps, but the 3D effect of the 3DS is a good example imo, without creative use of the 3D it's a worthless hardware advantage of the 3DS. And the graphic power of the Vita could be worthless too, if it only gets lazy ports of the marketleader 3DS.
|
Lazy ports? Like?
|
IF, just IF...man!
So hard to understand my point, really?
Ah one example could be the "Tales of Innocence:R" game, looks like a lazy port of a DS game.
