| Aprisaiden said:
The review should of compared it to 3DS where the battery life is on par, game pricing is fairly competitve (with the expection of Uncharted), and Vita has a price disadvantage (SONY should of aimed for $199 USD for the WiFi, maybe less RAM / weaker CPU + no sixaxis would of got them there). |
... Are you aware that you are complaining about a poorly written review yet clearly haven't read it properly? The review says £300 with a COUPLE of games. You then retorted that with only one game, it would cost the price of one game less. He also states £120 for the 3DS at Amazon, so you checked GAME???? Although it seems prices may have changed a little as currently the 3DS is available new on Amazon from £125. Then the reviewer notes that the games for 3DS are about £20-£30, which is right bar a few exceptions. Although these seem to be unreleased games. So he is saying you could get a Vita with a COUPLE of games for about £300 and a 3DS with a couple of games for £160-180. Which is a pretty much right, it would depend on the games you got.
He also very clearly does compare the PS Vita battery life to the 3DS battery life.
Honestly people are being way too harsh on the review. CNET isn't aimed at just gamers. So they reviewed it from the point of view of a casual user. Someone who would compare it to the iphone and 3DS etc. The review makes it pretty clear that if you are a core gamer then great, but if you are a casual gamer then it really isn't worth the investment. It's pretty hard to argue with that logic when nearly all consoles sell the first few months to core gamers and then when they get price drops etc spread wider.
