By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pineapple on 30 January 2012
Edit Thread
pezus said:
Pineapple said:

He's right, though. The human eye sees 24 frames per second as fluid. He never (as far as I can tell) says that the human eye can't observe higher, just that it's fluid at 24 frames per second. And it is.

It isn't. Why do you think movies have to use motion blur?


24 frames per second was long ago decided to be the best compromise betweeen the quality of the movie and film usage.

This PR manager says that they decided that 24 frames per second was a good bottom for their frame per second. Ultimately, this choice is similar in several ways.

It's largely using the same logic. You can obviously question their decision, but I'm rather opposed to just ridiculing the PR manager and claiming he did no research.