coolbeans said:
o_O.Q said:
coolbeans said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
kowenicki said:
No shit. Luckily it wasn't devised for such a thing. When will people get it? Kinect isn't trying to be and doesn't need to be a total replacement control system. It's an alternative for certain types if games, and it works very well in those games. |
Four words: "Kinect for the core". Microsoft wants to force Kinect down our throats. I like Dance Central and all but its not a core game. Star Wars, Ghost Recon Kinect etc. All those games are better done with the Move than the Kinect and can be called core titles, but Sony needs to reach out to devs commercially the same way Microsoft does. They have a product of substance, so they need to put glitter on substance....its not as hard as they might think. Microsoft can put glitter on anything.
|
Who's to say they have but pubs/devs rejected the offers. Many motion development pursuits were used on the Wii already and Move has shown no differences in overall control scheme.
|
kinect hasn't really either imo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=au3UJHItYgc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gOVj_I5npA
|
Sigh....since we're in 2012, that point isn't even worth arguing. The amount of new ideas given by the PC community makes your E3 fallout vids-and opinion-completely moot. *Rubs hands* Who's next?
|
were you talking about games support for an xbox 360 peripheral or hacks for pc?
if you were indeed talking about games support i don't see how what you said is relevant... if you can raise the argument of move's originality the same can be said for kinect in terms of how they are implemented into games for control
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=au3UJHItYgc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gOVj_I5npA
...or maybe i'm just seeing things and the gameplay types shown in the videos aren't similar at all
Essay Pro