benao87 said:
selnor said:
Well of course. This is one of those stupid questions not thought out again by the people asking this question.
Kinect is a control method that uses your full body input. We knew that before launch and we know that a year later.
I know Wii owners will try and say otherwise but games like the conduit show although doable the fps games with 1to1 aiming are just not as fast paced and less enjoyable.
There's a reason why gears of war 3 uses the controller and a reason why halo 4 microsofts biggest shooter franchise is also using the controller. Games like mass effect 3 with the previews saying kinect makes a real difference to the way the game plays are testamont to how kinect improves a shooter properly.
Kinect enhances our experiences and provides new experiences that are great.
When will the sad lonely people wake up and realise yesterdays game types were never meant for todays and tommorrows control schemes.
Wake up world. Halo anniversary, forza 4, mass effect 3 etc is how kinect is improving our hard ore games without ruining them.
Giant bomb among others state its hard to go back and play mass effect 3 without kinect. Like its hard to play old Zelda after SS. Its devs that need to move their games forward instead of shutting their minds off.
Hell anyone with a closed mind like some people would never work for any company id have.
|
Are you sure you are not from MS PR?
Is like you are forcing the Kinect brand down our throats.
|
wait does he really not work for Microsoft?
i seriously thought he worked for microsoft, im dead serious.
i didnt know there was any way for a non employee to be that pro-X company without being paid.
Essay Pro
