By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jazz2K on 28 January 2012
Edit Thread
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Jazz2K said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

The Move does what the Wii can do and also what it cannot. The Move does what the Kinect majorly can do and supports it for actual games properly. It's the perfect marriage, it just needs the Microsoft style publicity and more games. Microsoft is style, Sony is substance (in regards to motion controls and game focus)....Sony needs style or else their venture in the casual games sector will surely fail. Games like sorcery give me hope for the Move....but I dont feel like the existence of a game like that alienates me as a gamer. With Kinect it does unless you hate completely casual games. The Move gives casuals and core a reason to game simultaneously, the question is the quality of the library because the tech is there.


What does that even mean?


Style over substance is the age old tale of never judging a book by its over. A company creates a beautiful aesthetic and markets everything in your face but once all thats over and a lesson is to be learned or thing to be gained there is void. What are you playing? What are you getting out of it? Is it marketed properly towards you? ETC. Substance is that which consists of, or has the the proper composition. Kinect when it comes to games as a peripheral lacks substance, yet has style which is why it attracts casuals. The Move could've just been left the PS Eye but Sony knew it needed substance to push gaming in a different direction savy? If Sony thought the Kinect was the way to go Microsoft would have no Kinect.

Q & A:

What peripheral do you think could play Ghost Recon more accurately and not need a traditional controller?

A) Wii

B) Kinect

C) Move


Pushing gaming? Move? All it's gonna do is pursue what Nintendo already did and they are passed that already. Also people need to stop with this Sony passed Kinect because of blablabla... they realised how much work it would need them to operate it properly and they didn't have the nor knowledge nor the funds to do a proper software to complement the technology. It's not like Primesense handed it over to MS and MS didn't have anything to do you guys should read more on how Kinect came to life.

Also not holding anything is already a bigger step than holding something just becaus you can add other things. If you thought you could play a game without anything in your hands just because some MS rep said so then you need to learn to sort all these claims out. Playing a car game will always be better with a wheel why? Because that's how you do in real life. Immersion! But you also turn your head to look in your mirrors, when you shout orders to teammates you actually shout the orders in real life... then again immersion. When you dance well you don't have to hold sticks unless you're in a rave and crave those lightsticks. I could go on and on all night.

Shooters were made and crafted with keyboard and mouse at first and almost every PC gamers were saying they couldn't be properly done with controllers because there were too few buttons and it couldn't be as precise... hey guess what, shooters are made with controllers in mind first right now. It took then time but they changed how they made the controls so it would work better with controllers. How can you expect not the same thing with new devices. Next gen will probably see a new version of the Move and K2 and hopefully a new controller for Xbox, be sure to see gesture based games to take over.